1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1981 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1981 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Plymouth Reliant weights approximately 52 kg more than 1980 Chrysler 1609.
Because 1980 Chrysler 1609 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler 1609. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler 1609 | 1981 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Chrysler | Plymouth |
| Model | 1609 | Reliant |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1812 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1152 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2260 mm |
