1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1983 Zagato Zeta
To start off, 1983 Zagato Zeta is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 1609 would be higher.
Because 1980 Chrysler 1609 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler 1609. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Zagato Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Zagato Zeta has automatic transmission and 1980 Chrysler 1609 has manual transmission. 1980 Chrysler 1609 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Zagato Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler 1609 | 1983 Zagato Zeta | |
| Make | Chrysler | Zagato |
| Model | 1609 | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
