1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 730 kg more than 1980 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 1609 | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1609 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2730 mm |