1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler 1609. (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1204 kg more than 1980 Chrysler 1609. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chrysler 1609. (144 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler 1609 | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 1609 | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1812 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3510 mm |
