1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2005 Infiniti FX
To start off, 2005 Infiniti FX is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Infiniti FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Infiniti FX (280 HP) has 179 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler 1609. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Infiniti FX should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Infiniti FX weights approximately 764 kg more than 1980 Chrysler 1609. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Infiniti FX (366 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chrysler 1609. (144 Nm). This means 2005 Infiniti FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 1609 | 2005 Infiniti FX | |
Make | Chrysler | Infiniti |
Model | 1609 | FX |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2860 mm |