1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2005 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2005 Isuzu KB is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,998 cc, 2005 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Isuzu KB (129 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler 1609. (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Isuzu KB weights approximately 800 kg more than 1980 Chrysler 1609. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Chrysler 1609. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Isuzu KB (265 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chrysler 1609. (144 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler 1609 | 2005 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Chrysler | Isuzu |
| Model | 1609 | KB |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1812 cc | 2998 cc |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 265 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3030 mm |
