1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2012 Renault Latitude
To start off, 2012 Renault Latitude is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 1609 would be higher.
Because 1980 Chrysler 1609 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler 1609. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Latitude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler 1609 | 2012 Renault Latitude | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | 1609 | Latitude |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4897 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1832 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2760 mm |
