1980 Chrysler Avenger vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 1980 Chrysler Avenger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chrysler Avenger (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chrysler Avenger should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler Avenger weights approximately 75 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Chrysler Avenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler Avenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler Avenger | 1952 Saab 92 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Saab |
| Model | Avenger | 92 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2480 mm |
