1980 Chrysler Avenger vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Avenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Avenger would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler Avenger. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler Avenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler Avenger weights approximately 436 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler Avenger | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Westfield |
| Model | Avenger | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 444 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2320 mm |
