1980 Chrysler Avenger vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Avenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Avenger would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 173 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler Avenger. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler Avenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 807 kg more than 1980 Chrysler Avenger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chrysler Avenger. (93 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chrysler Avenger.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler Avenger | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
Model | Avenger | LS |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 2964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 232 HP |
Torque | 93 Nm | 298 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3020 mm |