1980 Chrysler Avenger vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Avenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Avenger would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler Avenger. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler Avenger.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Chrysler Avenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chrysler Avenger. (93 Nm). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chrysler Avenger.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler Avenger | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Chrysler | Citroen |
Model | Avenger | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 93 Nm | 380 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |