1980 Chrysler Avenger vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Avenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Avenger would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1660 kg more than 1980 Chrysler Avenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler Avenger | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Chrysler | Fisker |
| Model | Avenger | Karma |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3160 mm |
