1980 Chrysler Cordoba vs. 1996 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1996 Mercury Cougar is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Cordoba would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler Cordoba is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler Cordoba | 1996 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
| Model | Cordoba | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5899 cc | 3798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
