1980 Chrysler Cordoba vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Cordoba would be higher.
Because 1980 Chrysler Cordoba is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler Cordoba. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler Cordoba | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Cordoba | Clio |
Year Released | 1980 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2770 mm |