1980 Chrysler Cordoba vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Cordoba would be higher. At 5,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler Cordoba is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Chrysler Cordoba is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler Cordoba. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler Cordoba | 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
| Model | Cordoba | ESX 3 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5192 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3000 mm |
