1980 Chrysler Cordoba vs. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Cordoba would be higher. At 5,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler Cordoba is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Chrysler Cordoba. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler Cordoba | 2006 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Cordoba | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5192 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2880 mm |
