1980 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 800 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 2004 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2004 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler Le Baron | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Chrysler | MCC |
| Model | Le Baron | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 3678 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 1810 mm |
