1980 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 900 kg more than 1980 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler Le Baron | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Le Baron | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3678 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2890 mm |
