1980 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2006 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 80 kg more than 2006 Cadillac BLS.
Because 1980 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler Le Baron | 2006 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
| Model | Le Baron | BLS |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3678 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 149 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1460 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2680 mm |
