1980 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2011 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC90 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1980 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2011 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler Le Baron | 2011 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Le Baron | XC90 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2860 mm |