1980 Chrysler Newport vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Newport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Newport would be higher. At 5,209 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler Newport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler Newport. (161 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler Newport. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler Newport weights approximately 123 kg more than 2004 Lincoln LS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chrysler Newport (363 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln LS. (298 Nm). This means 1980 Chrysler Newport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler Newport | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
| Model | Newport | LS |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5209 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 232 HP |
| Torque | 363 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 1687 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5600 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2910 mm |
