1980 Chrysler Newport vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Newport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Newport would be higher. At 5,209 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler Newport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chrysler Newport (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chrysler Newport should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chrysler Newport (363 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1980 Chrysler Newport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler Newport | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Newport | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5209 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 363 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5600 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2710 mm |