1980 Citroen CX vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 1980 Citroen CX is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1980 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 1980 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 255 kg more than 1980 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Citroen CX | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | CX | Crestline |
Year Released | 1980 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2940 mm |