1980 Citroen CX vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1980 Citroen CX is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Citroen CX (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Citroen CX weights approximately 55 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Citroen CX. (152 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Citroen CX | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Citroen | Triumph |
Model | CX | 2000 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |