1980 Citroen CX vs. 1968 Jaguar 240
To start off, 1980 Citroen CX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1980 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 1980 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1980 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar 240 (204 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Citroen CX. (152 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1968 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Citroen CX | 1968 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | CX | 240 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.3 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 54 L |