1980 Citroen CX vs. 1971 Zastava 1300

To start off, 1980 Citroen CX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Citroen CX (105 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1971 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1971 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Citroen CX weights approximately 245 kg more than 1971 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1971 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Citroen CX (152 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1980 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: