1980 Citroen CX vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Citroen CX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Citroen CX (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Citroen CX (152 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 1980 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Citroen CX | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | CX | 66 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |