1980 Citroen CX vs. 2004 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1980 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1980 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Citroen CX weights approximately 34 kg more than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Neon (176 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Citroen CX. (152 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Citroen CX | 2004 Dodge Neon | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | CX | Neon |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1191 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.3 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 47 L |