1980 Citroen CX vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Citroen CX (105 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Citroen CX (152 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1980 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Citroen CX | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | 6 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 152 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.3 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 55 L |