1980 Citroen GSA vs. 1996 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 1996 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota RAV4 (126 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1980 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1980 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota RAV4 weights approximately 375 kg more than 1980 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Citroen GSA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Citroen GSA | 1996 Toyota RAV4 | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | GSA | RAV4 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 126 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2450 mm |
