1980 Citroen GSA vs. 2000 Acura EL
To start off, 2000 Acura EL is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1980 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1980 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura EL weights approximately 154 kg more than 1980 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Citroen GSA | 2000 Acura EL | |
Make | Citroen | Acura |
Model | GSA | EL |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2619 mm |