1980 Citroen GSA vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1980 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1980 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1980 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Citroen GSA | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | GSA | 6 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 64 L |