1980 Citroen GSA vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (435 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 379 more horse power than 1980 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1980 Citroen GSA.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Citroen GSA | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | GSA | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1129 cc | 4995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 435 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1860 mm |
