1980 Citroen GSA vs. 2006 Volvo V50
To start off, 2006 Volvo V50 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 2,522 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo V50 (218 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1980 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1980 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo V50 weights approximately 700 kg more than 1980 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Volvo V50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Citroen GSA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo V50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Citroen GSA | 2006 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | GSA | V50 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 2522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 60 L |