1980 Citroen GSA vs. 2009 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1980 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1980 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 517 kg more than 1980 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Citroen GSA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Citroen GSA | 2009 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Citroen | Nissan |
| Model | GSA | Armada |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1129 cc | 5551 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1442 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 106 L |
