1980 Citroen GSA vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC90 (200 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1980 Citroen GSA. (56 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1980 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1230 kg more than 1980 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Citroen GSA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Citroen GSA | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | GSA | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1129 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 2155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 80 L |
