1980 Citroen LN vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Citroen LN. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Citroen LN would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1980 Citroen LN. (35 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1980 Citroen LN. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Zastava 102 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1980 Citroen LN. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Citroen LN. (50 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Citroen LN.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Citroen LN | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | LN | 102 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 651 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 50 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2160 mm |