1980 Daihatsu Delta vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Daihatsu Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Daihatsu Delta would be higher. At 1,770 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Daihatsu Delta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (113 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1980 Daihatsu Delta. (92 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Daihatsu Delta.
Because 1980 Daihatsu Delta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Daihatsu Delta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Daihatsu Delta. (147 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Daihatsu Delta.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Daihatsu Delta | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
Model | Delta | 3 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1770 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2639 mm |