1980 Daihatsu Taft vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1980 Daihatsu Taft is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Zastava 1300 (53 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 40 kg more than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Because 1980 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Zastava 1300 (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1963 Zastava 1300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Daihatsu Taft | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Zastava |
Model | Taft | 1300 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 63 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2430 mm |