1980 Daihatsu Taft vs. 1964 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1980 Daihatsu Taft is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 156 kg more than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Because 1980 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford GT 40 (85 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm). This means 1964 Ford GT 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Daihatsu Taft | 1964 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
| Model | Taft | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 864 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2420 mm |
