1980 Daihatsu Taft vs. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1980 Daihatsu Taft is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 223 kg more than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1980 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1964 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Daihatsu Taft | 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Daihatsu | Reliant |
Model | Taft | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 63 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2290 mm |