1980 Daihatsu Taft vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 206 more horse power than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 630 kg more than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Daihatsu Taft | 1996 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Renault |
| Model | Taft | Clio |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2490 mm |
