1980 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1396 kg more than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 459 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Daihatsu Taft | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Daihatsu | Nissan |
Model | Taft | Armada |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 5555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 63 Nm | 522 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 2416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3140 mm |