1980 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 737 kg more than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1980 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Daihatsu Taft.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Daihatsu Taft 2010 Cadillac CTS
Make Daihatsu Cadillac
Model Taft CTS
Year Released 1980 2010
Engine Size 956 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 44 HP 304 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 63 Nm 370 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 5200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Vehicle Weight 1020 kg 1757 kg
Vehicle Length 3370 mm 4867 mm
Vehicle Width 1470 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1830 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 2030 mm 2880 mm