1980 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 770 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp (450 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1980 De Tomaso Longchamp | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | De Tomaso | Nissan |
Model | Longchamp | Cedric |
Year Released | 1980 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2540 mm |