1980 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 1045 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp (481 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1980 De Tomaso Longchamp | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | De Tomaso | Zastava |
Model | Longchamp | 102 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 481 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2160 mm |