1980 Dodge Aspen vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1980 Dodge Aspen is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Dodge Aspen (101 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Dodge Aspen should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 567 kg more than 1980 Dodge Aspen.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Dodge Aspen | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
| Make | Dodge | Humber |
| Model | Aspen | Pullman |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 4085 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 117.5 mm | 120 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 2032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3330 mm |
