1980 Dodge Aspen vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1980 Dodge Aspen is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Dodge Aspen (100 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Dodge Aspen should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 505 kg more than 1963 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Dodge Aspen (232 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1980 Dodge Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Dodge Aspen | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Dodge | Zastava |
Model | Aspen | 1300 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 232 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2430 mm |