1980 Dodge Aspen vs. 1964 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1980 Dodge Aspen is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Dodge Aspen (101 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Dodge Aspen should accelerate faster than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 965 kg more than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Dodge Aspen (231 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (33 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1980 Dodge Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Dodge Aspen | 1964 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Aspen | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 33 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2060 mm |
