1980 Dodge Aspen vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2003 Pagani Zonda is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 447 more horse power than 1980 Dodge Aspen. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1980 Dodge Aspen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 235 kg more than 2003 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Pagani Zonda (750 Nm) has 518 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Dodge Aspen. (232 Nm). This means 2003 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Dodge Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Dodge Aspen | 2003 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Dodge | Pagani |
Model | Aspen | Zonda |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 7300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 547 HP |
Torque | 232 Nm | 750 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2730 mm |